Knowledge article
Communicating EICR Observations to Duty Holders
Good EICRs explain observations in plain language — what was found, the code and why, the risk, and the recommended action — so duty holders can act with confidence.
A technically correct EICR is only useful if the duty holder can understand and act on it. Clear communication of observations turns a compliance document into a practical action plan.
What good communication looks like
For each observation, a well-written EICR (and the conversation around it) should make clear:
- What was found — described plainly, not just in code and clause numbers.
- The classification — C1, C2, C3 or FI, and why that code applies.
- The risk — what could happen if it is not addressed.
- The recommended action — and how urgent it is.
Avoiding jargon and alarm
Duty holders are rarely electricians. Explaining that a "C2 — inadequate main protective bonding" means "the bonding that protects against shock under fault needs upgrading urgently" is far more useful than the code alone. Equally, a Satisfactory report with C3s should be framed as good news with a few improvements, not a list of failures.
Why it matters
Clear communication:
- helps duty holders prioritise and budget remedial work correctly;
- reduces the risk of urgent items being misunderstood or ignored; and
- builds trust between the contractor and the client.
At Regis Compliance we walk clients through every observation so they know exactly what to do next — see remedial priorities.
More in this topic
Code explanation
EICR C1 Code: Danger Present
A C1 on an EICR means danger is present and a risk of injury exists. It requires immediate action and always makes a report Unsatisfactory.
Learn moreComparison
Difference Between C1 and C2 on an EICR
C1 means danger is present now and requires immediate action; C2 means potentially dangerous — safe now but a fault could make it dangerous. Both fail an EICR.
Learn moreCode explanation
EICR C2 Code: Potentially Dangerous
A C2 on an EICR means potentially dangerous — no immediate danger, but a fault could make it dangerous. It requires urgent remedial action and fails the report.
Learn moreComparison
Difference Between C2 and C3 on an EICR
C2 is potentially dangerous and fails an EICR, requiring urgent remedial work; C3 is a non-urgent improvement recommendation that keeps the report Satisfactory.
Learn moreThis article provides general guidance and distinguishes legislation, British Standards and good practice. It is not legal advice. Always confirm the specific duties applying to your property and tenure.
